I'm voting for myself here. Arugably my screen name as well as my words are the pulse of this messageboard from day one. Nobody likes to play devils advocate and put a realistic spin on things more then I do. You stir the pot like I do you risk having ruining your credibility to guys like Bennett who always 'plays it safe'. It's no knock on him or anyone else but it is what it is. One thing I will say that personally (the likeness of my screen name aside) I am a realist. I have a keen sense of how something is going to play out and sometimes this gets mistaken for opinion. One example I will always stand by is the Hamilton debacle. I called it before that first shovel broke ground. Next, even though the vision is clear and the plans look exciting Dania Casino and Jai Alai will be a total flop. It stuff like this that makes fellow chalkies ignore my name. I know there are chalkies who are still upset to this day about my 'dueness' theory which has been proven right. Remember when I gave out the due number of 4/13 and it came in twice that night LOL....Bada was right again. I get that nobody likes someone who is always right or ends up being right. There are still chalkies that just don't get my angle or my motives. That is what makes me the best chalkie ever. If you don't understand why yet then you will never get it.
