Jai-alai Question of the Week


Start of Thread

RE: QOW #388

Posted on March 11, 2011 at 11:50:52 AM by Milfordfan

Tiger, you know where I stand on this topic. Study after study shows that the lower denomination the bet, the higher the overall betting handle is. Granted, having a dime super on Jai Alai tremendously reduces any chance of a carryover, the truth of the matter is that having those 'winnings' spread about to many bettors increases the chances of the money being put back in the pools. (What's better for the game : One person hitting a super for $2,500, paying off $2,000 in bills, and rebetting $500---or 10 people hitting the same super for $250, with most of them putting the money back in the pools?

Recently, Gulfstream initiated the 'Rainbow 6'. It's a dime bet, but only pays out in it's entirety should ONE person hit it. (If multiple persons hit it, then 25% gets paid out, with the balance being carried over.) It has produced some ridiculous payouts.

I feel that if Jai Alai did something similar to this with the FINAL super every night, it could generate some nice carryovers. (At $1, it would cost $1,680 to go all x all x all x all, so some handicapping eould need to be done.) If they did a late pick 4 for a DIME, that same permutation would still cost a whopping $409.60, and the syndicates would be less apt to dive in, for fear of multiple winners.

The 'sweet spot', Tiger, doesn't necessarily lie in the AMOUNT of the bet, in as much as it does, the CREATIVITY, EXCITEMENT, and RISK vs. REWARD factor of the bet, IMHO.

Replies:

Home Page